“Yes, Mogadishu. Yes, Somalia. Can I get a receipt?” asks Ayan Mohmed
She’s just finished listing a string of account numbers and pushed five $20 dollar bills through a plastic window located behind a humming drink case at the Fresh and Green Produce Market in Tukwila.
That receipt confirms that her money, earned as a hairdresser, will make its way to her waiting husband back in Somalia.
It’s called “hawala” — Arabic for transfer — and money transfer operations (or MTO’s) like the “Dahabshil” MTO operating out of Fresh and Green works with a counterpart who will hand over money to the intended recipient in Somalia in a matter of hours.
Listen: End of wire transfers from Seattle to Somalia by Jessica Partnow for KUOW Public Radio
Eventually the two MTO branches have to settle up accounts, requiring a bank willing to wire money in between the United States and Somalia (or between the United States and an overseas bank that will then transfer to Somalia).
It’s complicated but it’s the only legal way to get money to the country — which has no formal banking system and no wire transfer services like Western Union — and today it will collapse completely, at least for Somali Americans in Washington state.
“It’s just like seeing a famine coming and not being able to do anything,” says Aynab Abdirahman, Chairman of the Washington State Refugee Advisory Council. “A lot of people are going to die.”
A 2013 report by Oxfam America, a humanitarian organization working on this issue, estimates that Somali Americans and Somalis in the United States send as much as $215 million back to their home country.
According to Jonathon Scanlon at Oxfam America, the value of these remittances are comparable to U.S. government foreign aid, humanitarian assistance and foreign investment to the country.
“It really is the largest and most important financial flow going into Somalia and most of it goes to families” says Scanlon, “Money going home to help keep kids in school… Money going home to help out the family business, money going home to just keep food on the table. It really is a lifeline for the country.”
But this lifeline has been under threat for some time. The hawala system has been used by a few as a cover for smuggling funds from the U.S. to extremist groups like Al-Shabab (there was a local case of this last summer) and as a result, restrictions on the system have grown increasingly strict. I wrote about this a year and a half ago when Barclay’s Bank announced it would no longer provide the wire transfer service between MTO’s.
Back then, there were still other banks serving money transfer operations in the Seattle area but many in our Somali-American community (one of the largest in the country) were already predicting a chain reaction. And they were right.
For these banks the difficulty of complying with U.S. anti-terrorism and international banking transparency regulations simply makes transferring funds to Somalia too risky.
Last week, Merchants Bank of California, the last bank still providing this transfer service for MTO’s in Washington state announced in a letter (obtained by Oxfam) that it too would end its partnerships with MTO’s serving Somalia today.
Merchants Bank didn’t respond to phone calls or emails, but the letter sent to MTO’s simply states, “We cannot in good faith meet the obligations [set by the Office of Comptroller of the Currency] given the complexity of your business.”
Scanlon doesn’t blame the banks. He says that they’ve been asked to take on too much risk and that the only hope for keeping the system alive is for that risk to be transferred to the U.S. government, perhaps via one of the Federal Reserve Banks.
Those I spoke with at Fresh and Green agreed that the United States government must step in to help. And there was a palpable rising panic as they calculated the potential loss to out-of-work relatives, aging parents and needy spouses back in Somalia.
“A lot of people are asking me… ‘Are you going to stop? Will we no longer be able to send money?’” says Dahabshil operator Abdiraza Mahand Osman in the little fluorescent lit office on the other side of the plastic window, “I say ‘I can do nothing. Maybe be patient, maybe the American government will do something.’”
But in the meantime, he’s planning to be out of work.
Why is your article title so racist? Many Somali parents send money home for their children who are living with relatives for food and school tuition, books and uniforms. Husbands send money home for their wives. Children send money home to elderly parents, or those who cannot work. How dare you write an article about a lifeline to thousands, and title it as such. Where is your journalistic integrity? Or did you just want some attention?
Shame on you.
Love-
There is nothing racist about the article. I am not even sure how you came to that conclusion. You are letting your passion get in the way from logically understanding both the title as well as the article. It is a little bit ironic because the author has made the same point you put forward. I am of Somali descent myself and this issue is of paramount importance to all Somali diaspora members including here in Seattle. From as long as I can remember, I have been accustomed to my parents answering the phone, sometimes in the middle of the night, from all sorts of extended kin and relatives asking for help. This could be a medical emergency, school fees, monthly stipends for food and housing, funeral arrangements, or anything. It is actually the least known, but perhaps one of the most important features of Somali immigrants like my family…that with such meager resources a minimum of a third of household monthly expenditure is spent taking care of relatives back home. The World Bank did a study highlighting as remittances as the economic lifeline (the LIFELINE) of the entire country. As much as the world thinks humanitarian catastrophe has befallen Somalia, without the general remittances of Somalis abroad to relatives back home, the state of human suffering would be unparalleled in the annals of modern history. It is terrible that banks no longer feel they can provide this transfer while at the same time complying with new government guidelines born from issues relating to terrorism and money laundering. There has to be a way to bridge this gap in order to allow Somali remittances to continue serving as the lifeline it is while simultaneously mitigating the level of risk associated with the issues which brought in the Comptroller’s guidelines. I think this is what the title of the article was hinting at.
Thanks to you both for commenting. The article title has been updated from “Terrorism fears cut a critical lifeline to Somalia” to the current version.
Thanks Alex
It seems like the Minnesota Somali community and their allies worked fast.
Just today Minnesota’s two Senators, Amy Klobuchar, and Minneapolis representative Keith Ellison have forwarded a request to speak with the Obama Administration about protecting Somali remittances.
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2015/02/07/minn-politicians-seek-time-with-obama-on-money-transfers-to-somalia
We need to work here in Seattle too and get our representatives to join them. Senator Murray, and Cantwell too, can add considerable support. I remember when I was in middle school at Washington Middle School, Rep Jim McDermott told me he spent time in Somalia in the 80’s when it was peaceful and is keenly aware of the issues affecting the Somali-American members of his constituency here in the district.
The Globalist should help enlisting their support in this cause.